Lesson L4N2High-Level Reading25 min

Reading Editorial Opinion Pieces

This lesson guides you through tackling editorial opinion pieces, a challenging text type for N2 learners. You will practice identifying the author's main argument, supporting evidence, and rhetorical devices, while building vocabulary for abstract and persuasive language commonly found in these texts.

🎯 Goal: Read and analyze editorial opinion pieces.

Lesson Content

Learning Goal

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to read and analyze Japanese editorial opinion pieces (shasetsu / 社説). You’ll learn to identify the writer’s main argument, recognize common rhetorical structures, and understand key opinion-marking expressions used in formal Japanese journalism.

Concept

Editorial opinion pieces in Japanese are persuasive essays that argue a specific viewpoint on a current issue. Unlike news articles (which report facts neutrally), editorials use strong language to advocate, criticize, or propose solutions. They follow a predictable structure:

  • Introduction (problem/issue)
  • Background (context/facts)
  • Argument (writer’s opinion)
  • Conclusion (call to action or summary)

Key vocabulary includes opinion verbs (e.g., 考える kangaeru – to think), persuasive phrases (e.g., べきだ beki da – should), and hedging expressions (e.g., かもしれない kamoshirenai – might).

Step-by-Step Breakdown

Step 1: Recognize the Structure

Most editorials open with a problem statement, then provide supporting facts, then state the writer’s opinion, and end with a suggestion or warning.

Example structure:

  • 冒頭 (bōtō) – Opening: “最近、…という問題が起きている。” (Recently, the problem of … has arisen.)
  • 背景 (haikei) – Background: “例えば、…というデータがある。” (For example, there is data that …)
  • 主張 (shuchō) – Argument: “私は…と考える。” (I think that …)
  • 結論 (ketsuron) – Conclusion: “したがって、…べきだ。” (Therefore, we should …)

Step 2: Learn Key Opinion-Marking Expressions

Editorials often use these phrases to signal the writer’s stance:

JapaneseRomajiEnglish
~べきだ~beki dashould / ought to
~と考える~to kangaeruthink that…
~に違いない~ni chigainaimust be / no doubt
~かもしれない~kamoshirenaimight / may
~とは言えない~to wa ienaicannot say that…
~必要がある~hitsuyō ga aruit is necessary to…

Step 3: Identify the Writer’s Main Argument

Look for sentences with 私は (watashi wa) or 筆者は (hissha wa – the writer). The main argument often appears after しかし (shikashi – however) or だが (daga – but), which signal a shift from background to opinion.

Example:

  • 背景: “経済成長は続いている。” (Economic growth continues.)
  • しかし: “しかし、格差は広がっている。” (However, inequality is widening.)
  • 主張: “政府は対策を強化すべきだ。” (The government should strengthen measures.)

Step 4: Watch for Hedging and Certainty

Editorials use hedging to soften claims or show caution:

  • 可能性がある (kanōsei ga aru) – there is a possibility
  • 懸念される (kenen sareru) – is a concern
  • ~と思われる (~to omowareru) – it seems that…

Strong certainty:

  • 間違いなく (machigainaku) – without a doubt
  • 明らかに (akiraka ni) – clearly

Mini Examples

Example 1 (Opening + Opinion):

最近、少子化問題が深刻化している。政府は早急に対策を考えるべきだ。
Saikin, shōshika mondai ga shinkoku-ka shite iru. Seifu wa sōkyū ni taisaku o kangaeru beki da.
Recently, the declining birthrate problem has become serious. The government should consider measures urgently.

Example 2 (Background + Contrast + Argument):

経済は回復傾向にある。しかし、雇用の質は改善していない。したがって、労働環境の見直しが必要だ。
Keizai wa kaifuku keikō ni aru. Shikashi, koyō no shitsu wa kaizen shite inai. Shitagatte, rōdō kankyō no minaoshi ga hitsuyō da.
The economy is on a recovery trend. However, the quality of employment has not improved. Therefore, a review of the working environment is necessary.

Example 3 (Hedging):

この政策は効果があるかもしれないが、長期的な影響は懸念される。
Kono seisaku wa kōka ga aru kamoshirenai ga, chōki-teki na eikyō wa kenen sareru.
This policy might be effective, but long-term effects are a concern.

Common Mistake

Mistake: Confusing the writer’s opinion with factual reporting.

  • In editorials, sentences with ~べきだ or ~と考える are opinions, not facts.
  • Example: “政府は増税すべきだ” (The government should raise taxes) is an opinion, not a fact.
  • Fix: Always ask: “Is this a fact (data/event) or the writer’s view (opinion verb/べき)?”

Quick Practice

Mini Drill 1: Identify the opinion part in this sentence:

環境問題は深刻だ。しかし、個人の努力だけでは解決できない。政府と企業が協力すべきだ。
Kankyō mondai wa shinkoku da. Shikashi, kojin no doryoku dake de wa kaiketsu dekinai. Seifu to kigyō ga kyōryoku subeki da.

Answer: The opinion part is “政府と企業が協力すべきだ” (The government and companies should cooperate).

Mini Drill 2: Fill in the blank with the correct opinion expression (べきだ / かもしれない / に違いない):

このデータを見ると、経済は回復しつつある______。
Kono dēta o miru to, keizai wa kaifuku shitsutsu aru ______.

Answer: に違いない (ni chigainai) – “must be recovering” (strong certainty based on data).

Summary and Next Step

You now know how to:

  • Recognize the structure of an editorial (problem → background → argument → conclusion)
  • Identify opinion-marking expressions (べきだ, と考える, に違いない, etc.)
  • Distinguish facts from opinions
  • Watch for hedging and certainty signals

Next Step: Practice reading a real Japanese editorial (e.g., from 朝日新聞 or 読売新聞 online). Underline all opinion expressions and summarize the writer’s main argument in one sentence. Then, try writing your own short editorial on a familiar topic (e.g., school rules or technology) using べきだ and と考える.

Practice Drills

No interactive practices assigned to this lesson yet.

Lesson Materials

Vocabulary (0)

No vocabulary in this lesson.

Grammar (0)

No grammar rules in this lesson.

Kanji (0)

No kanji characters in this lesson.

Kana (0)

No kana characters in this lesson.